[dpdk-dev] doc/versioning: add missing return value type in MAP_STATIC_SYMBOL example
Commit Message
The example only had as return type struct, it is actually struct rte_acl_ctx *
Signed-off-by: Mauricio Vasquez B <mauricio.vasquez@polito.it>
---
doc/guides/contributing/versioning.rst | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Comments
2016-08-14 18:21, Mauricio Vasquez B:
> The example only had as return type struct, it is actually struct rte_acl_ctx *
>
> Signed-off-by: Mauricio Vasquez B <mauricio.vasquez@polito.it>
Applied (minus a whitespace), thanks
@@ -331,11 +331,12 @@ defined, we add this
.. code-block:: c
- struct rte_acl_create_v21(const struct rte_acl_param *param, int debug)
+ struct rte_acl_ctx *
+ rte_acl_create_v21(const struct rte_acl_param *param, int debug)
{
...
}
- MAP_STATIC_SYMBOL(struct rte_acl_create(const struct rte_acl_param *param, int debug), rte_acl_create_v21);
+ MAP_STATIC_SYMBOL(struct rte_acl_ctx * rte_acl_create(const struct rte_acl_param *param, int debug), rte_acl_create_v21);
That tells the compiler that, when building a static library, any calls to the
symbol ``rte_acl_create`` should be linked to ``rte_acl_create_v21``