diff mbox

[dpdk-dev] maintainers: add staging tree for network drivers

Message ID 1469459986-22667-1-git-send-email-bruce.richardson@intel.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded, archived
Delegated to: Thomas Monjalon
Headers

Commit Message

Bruce Richardson July 25, 2016, 3:19 p.m. UTC 
  Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
---
 MAINTAINERS | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

Comments

Thomas Monjalon July 25, 2016, 3:28 p.m. UTC | #1 
2016-07-25 16:19, Bruce Richardson:
> +Staging Trees
> +-------------
> +
> +Networking Drivers
> +T: git://dpdk.org/dpdk-next-net
> +M: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>

I thought we could write the next- tree information below the
existing title:

Networking Drivers
------------------
Bruce Richardson July 25, 2016, 4:21 p.m. UTC | #2 
On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 05:28:40PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2016-07-25 16:19, Bruce Richardson:
> > +Staging Trees
> > +-------------
> > +
> > +Networking Drivers
> > +T: git://dpdk.org/dpdk-next-net
> > +M: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> 
> I thought we could write the next- tree information below the
> existing title:
> 
> Networking Drivers
> ------------------
> 

Maybe, but I think it would work better to have all the staging trees listed
together at the top of the file. Makes it easier to see on opening the file
that they exist.

/Bruce
De Lara Guarch, Pablo Aug. 23, 2016, 12:15 a.m. UTC | #3 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Bruce Richardson
> Sent: Monday, July 25, 2016 9:22 AM
> To: Thomas Monjalon
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: add staging tree for network
> drivers
> 
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 05:28:40PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 2016-07-25 16:19, Bruce Richardson:
> > > +Staging Trees
> > > +-------------
> > > +
> > > +Networking Drivers
> > > +T: git://dpdk.org/dpdk-next-net
> > > +M: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> >
> > I thought we could write the next- tree information below the
> > existing title:
> >
> > Networking Drivers
> > ------------------
> >
> 
> Maybe, but I think it would work better to have all the staging trees listed
> together at the top of the file. Makes it easier to see on opening the file
> that they exist.

I am going to send a patch to add also the staging tree for crypto. What is the conclusion of this?
If we go for this way, we should move also the virtio stuff to this new section, right?

Pablo
> 
> /Bruce
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index d099131..844227b 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -34,6 +34,13 @@  Stable Branches
 ---------------
 T: git://dpdk.org/dpdk-stable
 
+Staging Trees
+-------------
+
+Networking Drivers
+T: git://dpdk.org/dpdk-next-net
+M: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
+
 Security Issues
 ---------------
 M: maintainers@dpdk.org